{"id":1472,"date":"2019-12-15T07:02:38","date_gmt":"2019-12-15T00:02:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/?p=1472"},"modified":"2019-12-27T11:12:00","modified_gmt":"2019-12-27T04:12:00","slug":"multi-criteria-decision-making","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/2019\/12\/multi-criteria-decision-making\/","title":{"rendered":"MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING"},"content":{"rendered":"

Oleh: <\/strong>Shelvy Kurniawan*, <\/strong>Sandra Gunawan<\/strong><\/p>\n

*)Faculty Member Management Binus Business School Undergraduate Program<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Multi Criteria Decision Making<\/em> adalah salah satu metode yang membantu proses pengambilan keputusan yang memiliki banyak kriteria. Menurut Mulliner, Malys, dan Maliene (2016), Multi Criteria Decision Making<\/em> adalah seperangkat metode yang berhubungan dengan evaluasi serangkaian alternatif yang banyak, sering bertentangan, dan berbagai kriteria. Tujuan dari Multi Criteria Decision Making <\/em>adalah untuk memberikan pilihan, peringkat, deskripsi, klasifikasi, pengelompokan, dan untuk mengurutkan alternatif dari yang paling disukai hingga opsi yang paling tidak disukai. Terdapat tiga tahap yang diikuti oleh semua metode Multi Criteria Decision Making <\/em>yaitu:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Menentukan kriteria dan alternatif yang relevan;<\/li>\n
  2. Melampirkan ukuran numerik untuk kepentingan relatif dari kriteria dan dampak terhadap alternatif dari kriteria tersebut;<\/li>\n
  3. Memproses nilai numerik untuk menentukan peringkat dari masing-masing alternatif.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Menurut Asadabadi (2018) metode-metode Multi-Criteria Decision-Making<\/em> pada saat ini sudah banyak dikembangkan untuk memfasilitasi penyeleksian terhadap alternatif yang memiliki banyak kriteria. Di antaranya terdapat beberapa metode MCDM yang telah banyak digunakan seperti berikut:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Analytical Hierarchy Process<\/em> (AHP)<\/li>\n
    2. Analytical Network Process<\/em> (ANP)<\/li>\n
    3. Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations<\/em> (PROMETHEE)<\/li>\n
    4. Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje <\/em>(Multi-criteria optimation and compromise solution or<\/em> VIKOR)<\/li>\n
    5. Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite <\/em>(Elemination and Choise Expressing Reality or<\/em> ELECTRE)<\/li>\n
    6. Best Worst Method <\/em>(BWM)<\/li>\n
    7. Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution <\/em>(TOPSIS)<\/li>\n
    8. Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory <\/em>(DEMATEL).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Dikutip dari jurnal Rezaei (2015), terdapat beberapa perkembangan terbaru dari MCDM seperti metode-metode berikut:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Superiority and Inferiority Ranking<\/em> (SIR)<\/li>\n
      2. Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis<\/em> (SWARA)<\/li>\n
      3. Subjective Weighting Method Using Continuous Interval Scale<\/em><\/li>\n
      4. Multi-Attribute Evaluation using Imprecise Weight Estimates<\/em> (IMP)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Sumber:<\/p>\n

        Asadabadi, M. R. (2018). The Stratified Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162<\/em>, 115-123.<\/p>\n

        Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for the Assessment of Sustainable Housing Affordability. Omega<\/em>, 146-156.<\/p>\n

        Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Omega, 53<\/em>, 49-57.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Oleh: Shelvy Kurniawan*, Sandra Gunawan *)Faculty Member Management Binus Business School Undergraduate Program \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Multi Criteria Decision Making adalah salah satu metode yang membantu proses pengambilan keputusan yang memiliki banyak kriteria. Menurut Mulliner, Malys, dan Maliene (2016), Multi Criteria Decision Making adalah seperangkat metode yang berhubungan dengan evaluasi serangkaian alternatif yang banyak, sering bertentangan, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1472"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1475,"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472\/revisions\/1475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bbs.binus.ac.id\/management\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}